STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review,
v.
Robert Dale HEILMAN, Petitioner on Review.
Supreme Court of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted January 12, 2005.
Decided December 30, 2005.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Eric M. Cumfer, Senior Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner on review. With him on the briefs were Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, Office of Public Defense Services and Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Office of Public Defense Services.
David J. Amesbury, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause and filed the briefs for respondent on review. With him on the briefs were Hardy Myers, Attorney General and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
DURHAM, J.
In this criminal case, defendant challenges the 20-year enhancement of his prison sentence as a "dangerous offender" under ORS 161.725(1)(a).1 His primary contention is that the trial court erred in sentencing him as a dangerous offender because the state had not pleaded in the indictment the facts necessary to support such an enhancement. The trial court rejected that argument before applying a 20-year enhancement to his sentence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.