The motion court properly based the challenged restraint upon a finding that it is in the child's "best interests to have the benefit of his parents' full attention during his time with them, at least until his apparent anxiety (as reported by [the forensic evaluator]) about the divorce has abated" (see Colley v. Colley,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BARNETT v. BARNETT
21 A.D.3d 829 (2005)
801 N.Y.S.2d 291
JENNIFER PECK BARNETT, Respondent, v. CRAIG BARNETT, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 22, 2005.
September 22, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
