1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 5 N.Y.3d
  5. 5 N.Y.3d 834 (2005)
 

PEOPLE v. DUNBAR

5 N.Y.3d 834 (2005)

840 N.E.2d 106

806 N.Y.S.2d 137

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. HAROLD L. DUNBAR, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided October 20, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, Syracuse (Audra Albright and James P. Maxwell of counsel), for appellant.

Lawrence A. Wangerman, Syracuse, for respondent.

Before: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges G.B. SMITH, CIPARICK, ROSENBLATT, GRAFFEO, READ and R.S. SMITH concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The suppression court, affirmed by the Appellate Division, held that the police did not have a founded suspicion that criminal activity was afoot, as needed in order to engage in the more extended, accusatory questioning attendant to a common-law inquiry. As we held in People v Hollman (79 N.Y.2d 181, 191-192 [1992]...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases