SPYROPOULOS v. HIRSH


21 A.D.3d 818 (2005)

801 N.Y.S.2d 288

PETER SPYROPOULOS, Appellant, v. WILLIE HAIM HIRSH, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

September 22, 2005.


Defendant should not be prejudiced by his prior attorney's default, which was inadvertent, unintentional and an isolated incident devoid of any pattern of dilatory behavior (CPLR 2005; Latha Rest. Corp. v. Tower Ins. Co., 285 A.D.2d 437 [2001]).

Plaintiff's showing as against Hirsh was insufficient to provide a basis for relief against him under Civil Rights Law §§ 50 and 51. Plaintiff's seventh cause of action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases