Since defendant made only generalized objections to testimony that store security personnel had been warned to watch him while he was in the store because he had previously been fired from his position as a store employee, defendant failed to preserve his present claim that such testimony constituted inadmissible hearsay, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the evidence was not received for its truth, but...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
