U.S. v. ARNOLD

No. 04-5384.

434 F.3d 396 (2005)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph ARNOLD, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: November 23, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ON BRIEF: Robert C. Brooks, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellant. David N. Pritchard, Assistant United States Attorney, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee.

Before: MOORE and SUTTON, Circuit Judges; CARMAN, Judge.


The court delivered a PER CURIAM opinion.

SUTTON, J. (pp. 407-12), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.

AMENDED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court on the government's petition for rehearing en banc. Upon consideration of the relevant briefs and the record, we vacate our prior opinion, United States v. Arnold, 410 F.3d 895 (6th Cir.2005), and replace it with this amended opinion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases