1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 122 P.3d
  5. 122 P.3d 684 (2005)
 

STATE v. HANKERSON

No. 20020974-CA.

122 P.3d 684 (2005)

2005 UT App 388

STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Enoch HANKERSON, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

September 15, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Heather Chesnut and Robert K. Heineman, Salt Lake City, for Appellant.

Mark L. Shurtleff and Kris C. Leonard, Salt Lake City, for Appellee.

Before BILLINGS, P.J., DAVIS, and ORME, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

DAVIS, Judge:

¶ 1 This case is before us on remand from the Utah Supreme Court. In State v. Hankerson, 2005 UT 47, 531 Utah Adv. Rep. 7, the supreme court reversed the appeals court determination that Defendant's motion to dismiss tolled the 120-day speedy trial period required under Utah Code section 77-29-1, see Utah Code Ann. § 77-29-1 (2003), and now instructs us to address the remaining issues raised by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases