WAGENER v. SBC PENSION BENEFIT PLAN-NON BARGAINED

No. 04-7060.

407 F.3d 395 (2005)

Marian R. WAGENER, On behalf of herself and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Donald F. Champoux, On behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellants v. SBC PENSION BENEFIT PLAN — NON BARGAINED PROGRAM, Appellee

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided May 17, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marc I. Machiz argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Marka Peterson and Eli Gottesdiener.

John L. Carter argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were Bruce A. Blefeld and C. Michael Buxton.

Before: EDWARDS, SENTELLE, and ROBERTS, Circuit Judges.


HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge.

The principal question in this case is whether plaintiffs-appellants Marian Wagener and Donald Champoux stated a claim upon which relief can be granted in their complaint alleging that defendant-appellee, the SBC Pension Benefit Plan-Nonbargained Program ("SBC Plan" or "Plan"), impermissibly discriminated against plaintiffs and other Plan participants in the administration of the SBC Plan. We conclude that plaintiffs have indeed stated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases