Contrary to the defendant's contention, the hearing court properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony. There is no requirement that a defendant in a lineup be surrounded by individuals who are nearly identical to him in appearance (see People v Chipp,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. GRANGER
18 A.D.3d 774 (2005)
794 N.Y.S.2d 914
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERCREY GRANGER, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 23, 2005.
May 23, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.