EMPLOYEES INTALCO ALUMINUM v. EMPLOYMENT

Nos. 54772-1-I, 54870-1-I, 54871-9-I.

114 P.3d 675 (2005)

EMPLOYEES OF INTALCO ALUMINUM CORP., et al, Respondents/Cross Appellants, v. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT OF the STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant/Cross Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

June 13, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary Barrett, Attorney General's Office, Olympia, WA, Louis A. Falcone, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA., for Appellants.

Catherine M. Cabalo, Brandt Law Group, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.


ELLINGTON, A.C.J.

¶ 1 Employees who accepted voluntary severance packages were denied unemployment benefits. Because there was no written layoff announcement and the employer did not take the final action to grant the severance, the employees do not qualify for benefits under the employer-initiated layoff rule. The employees' acceptance of voluntary severance did not constitute good cause to quit. The employees are therefore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases