1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 124 P.3d
  5. 124 P.3d 640 (2005)
 

CHEVRON v. PUGET SOUND GROWTH MANAGEMENT

No. 75879-4.

124 P.3d 640 (2005)

156 Wash.2d 131

CHEVRON U.S.A., INC., Petitioner, v. CENTRAL PUGET SOUND GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BOARD, an agency of the State of Washington; Town of Woodway, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington; and Snohomish County, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, Respondents, and City of Shoreline, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, Respondent. Snohomish County, Respondent, v. City of Shoreline, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, Respondent, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Petitioner, Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board, an agency of the State of Washington, and Town of Woodway, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Washington.

Decided December 15, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Michael P. Witek, Helsell Fetterman LLP, Mr. Jerret E. Sale, Ms. Deborah Lynn Carstens, Bullivant Houser Bailey PC, Seattle, for Petitioner/Appellant.

Ms. Martha Patricia Lantz, Office of the Attorney General, Licensing & Admin. Law Division, Olympia, Mr. Scott Michael Missall, Ms. Beth Gordie, Short Cressman & Burgess PLLC, Seattle, for Appellee/Respondent.

Mr. John Roberts Moffat, Civil Division, Snohomish County Prosecutor's, Everett, Mr. Ian Richard Sievers, City of Shoreline Attorney, Shoreline, for Appellee/Respondent.

Kristopher Ian Tefft, Association of Washington Business, Olympia, for Amicus Curiae (Association of Washington Business).

Daniel Brian Heid, City of Auburn, for Amicus Curiae (Washington State Ass'n of Municipal Attorneys).

Richard M. Stephens, Diana M. Kirchheim, Groen Stephens & Klinge LLP, Bellevue, for Amicus Curiae (Washington Ass'n of Realtors).

En Banc.

JOHNSON, J.

¶ 1 This court is asked to determine if constitutional due process principles require individual notification to a landowner whose land is designated a potential annexation area under an adjacent town's comprehensive plan. The Court of Appeals held Chevron U.S.A., Inc.'s (Chevron) due process rights were not implicated here because the town of Woodway's comprehensive plan amendments do not infringe upon Chevron's property rights. We agree with the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases