In re GRAND JURY SUBPOENA: UNDER SEAL Under Seal, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
United States of America, Respondent-Appellee.
In re Grand Jury Subpoena: Under Seal
Under Seal, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
United States of America, Respondent-Appellee.
In re Grand Jury Subpoena United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kent Wakeford, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued March 17, 2005.
Decided July 18, 2005.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
ARGUED: Alison Courtney Barnes, Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck & Untereiner, L.L.P., Washington, D.C.; William H. Crispin, Crispin & Associates, P.L.L.C., Washington, D.C.; Henry Winchester Asbill, Cozen O'Connor, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Charles Francis Connolly, Assistant United States Attorney, Office Of The United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Lauren A. Greenberg, Crispin & Associates, P.L.L.C., Washington, D.C.; Lawrence S. Robbins, Gary A. Orseck, Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck & Untereiner, L.L.P., Washington, D.C.; William B. Moffitt, L. Barrett Boss, Cozen O'Connor, Washington, D.C.; Paul Hugel, Charles Clayman, Clayman & Rosenberg, New York, New York, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Dana J. Boente, Assistant United States Attorney, Adam A. Reeves, Trial Attorney, Criminal Division, United States Department of Justice, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and SAMUEL G. WILSON, United States District Judge for the Western District of Virginia, sitting by designation.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILSON wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINS and Judge NIEMEYER joined.
WILSON, District Judge.
This is an appeal by three former employees of AOL Time Warner ("AOL") from the decision of the district court denying their motions to quash a grand jury subpoena for documents related to an internal investigation by AOL. Appellants in the district court that the subpoenaed documents were protected by the attorney...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.