1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 365 S.C.
  5. 365 S.C. 383 (2005)
 

ZIMMERMAN v. MARSH

No. 26029.

365 S.C. 383 (2005)

618 S.E.2d 898

Steven J. ZIMMERMAN & Sarah M. Zimmerman, Respondents, v. Vicki Lane MARSH, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided August 15, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert H. Gwin, III, of Gwin Law Offices, L.L.C., of Myrtle Beach, for petitioner.

Robert H. O'Donnell, of O'Donnell Law Firm, L.L.C., of Georgetown, for respondents.

Justice MOORE:

This action arose when respondents (Zimmermans) sought the partition of a parcel of property they jointly owned with petitioner (Marsh). The master-in-equity found partition by allotment was not feasible and ordered a judicial sale of the property. The Court of Appeals affirmed in an unpublished opinion. Zimmerman v. Marsh, Op. No. 2003-UP-662 (S.C. Ct.App. filed November 17, 2003). We reverse and remand.

FACTS

In 1991, Marsh...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases