SOTO v. CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INC.

No. A04A1642.

611 S.E.2d 108 (2005)

271 Ga. App. 813

SOTO v. CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INC.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

March 1, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amy Budow, Eric Fortas, Shireen Hormozdi, Adam Krohn, Krohn & Moss, Atlanta, Chicago, for Appellant.

John McKinley, Jr., Carter & Ansley, Atlanta, for Appellee.


SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Pedro Soto appeals from the grant of summary judgment to CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc., in an action he filed seeking damages in connection with his purchase of a used Chevrolet Blazer. Soto sought recovery under several theories, but only his claim of breach of implied warranties is at issue in this appeal. We find that the trial court correctly ruled that Soto presented no evidence that the vehicle was defective at the time of sale, and we...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases