1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 364 F.Supp.2d
  5. 364 F.Supp.2d 346 (2005)
 

KIM v. CO-OP. CENTRALE RAIFFEISEN-BOERENLEEBANK

No. 03 CIV. 1547JES.

364 F.Supp.2d 346 (2005)

Hokyung "Harrison" KIM, Plaintiff, v. CO-OPERATIVE CENTRALE RAIFFEISEN-BOERENLEENBANK B.A., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

April 5, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rose & Rose, P.C., Attorneys for Plaintiff Hokyung "Harrison" Kim, Washington, D.C., Joshua N. Rose, Esq., Of Counsel.

Law Offices of Neal Brickman, Attorneys for Plaintiff Hokyung "Harrison" Kim, New York, Neal Brickman, Esq., Ethan Leonard, Esq., Of Counsel.

Robson Ferber Frost Chan & Essner, LLP, Attorneys for Defendant Co-operative Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A., New York, Robert M. Kaplan, Esq., Of Counsel.

McMillan Constabile LLP, Attorneys for Defendant Michael Ice, Larchmont, William J. Foster, IV, Esq., Of Counsel.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SPRIZZO, District Judge.

The present controversy involves the effect that a Singapore court's order dismissing a claim and granting costs has on a subsequent action brought in this Court between the same parties on the same causes of action. Because Singapore law would deem this action precluded, and because New York law would recognize and enforce the Singapore judgment for costs, this Court grants defendants' motions for summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases