1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 408 F.3d
  5. 408 F.3d 295 (2005)
 

GISMONDI v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

No. 03-2410.

408 F.3d 295 (2005)

Bernard GISMONDI, Thomas Chalifoux, Edward Kisch, Arthur Knack, Richard Ratke, James Salliotte, and Jeffrey Stone, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: May 24, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Charles Gottlieb, Gottlieb & Goren, Bingham Farms, Michigan, for Appellants. Daniel A. Schwartz, Day, Berry & Howard, Hartford, Connecticut, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Charles Gottlieb, Gottlieb & Goren, Bingham Farms, Michigan, for Appellants. Daniel A. Schwartz, Day, Berry & Howard, Hartford, Connecticut, Lawrence S. Gadd, Harnisch & Associates, Bingham Farms, Michigan, for Appellee.

Before: BOGGS, Chief Judge; MARTIN, Circuit Judge; GWIN, District Judge.

OPINION

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.

The seven plaintiffs in this case are former employees of United Technologies Automotive, a division of defendant United Technologies Corporation. On May 4, 1999, United Technologies sold its Automotive division to Lear Corporation. Subsequently, the plaintiffs sought early retirement benefits from United Technologies; the Corporation's Benefit Claims Appeal Committee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases