1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 29 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 29 Cal.Rptr.3d 673 (2005)
 

CRAMER v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. B176464.

29 Cal.Rptr.3d 673 (2005)

130 Cal.App.4th 42

Gary CRAMER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing July 6, 2005.

Review Denied August 24, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lewis, Marenstein, Wicke & Sherwin and Thomas J. Wicke, Woodland Hills; Law Office of David J. Duchrow and David J. Duchrow, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Paul Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Paul W. Cane, Jr., and Elizabeth A. Falcone, Los Angeles; Jones Day, Elwood Lui, San Francisco, Scott D. Bertzyk, and Kirstin Poirier-Whitley, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents.

ARMSTRONG, J.

Los Angeles County court reporters filed this suit against their employers,1 respondents Los Angeles County Superior Court and County of Los Angeles, seeking to have the sums they earn for preparation of transcripts in cases considered for purposes of calculating their retirement benefits. On respondents' demurrers, the trial court found that those sums may not be included, citing Government Code2

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases