1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 16 A.D.3d
  5. 16 A.D.3d 685 (2005)
 

IN THE MATTER OF DENHAM v. KAPLAN

16 A.D.3d 685 (2005)

793 N.Y.S.2d 58

In the Matter of SHEREE DENHAM, Respondent, v. STEVEN KAPLAN, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 28, 2005.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In light of the father's contradictory testimony regarding his finances and his failure to submit several requested documents, including a properly completed and notarized financial disclosure affidavit, the Family Court properly determined that the Support Magistrate had insufficient information to determine the father's gross income (see Kay v Kay, 37 N.Y.2d 632 [1975];

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases