1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 18 A.D.3d
  5. 18 A.D.3d 677 (2005)
 

ANDERSON v. MASTRANGELO

18 A.D.3d 677 (2005)

796 N.Y.S.2d 118

ROBERT ANDERSON et al., Respondents, v. MICHAEL F. MASTRANGELO, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 23, 2005.

The determination of the trial court after a nonjury trial should not be disturbed on appeal unless it is clear that the court's conclusions could not have been reached upon a fair interpretation of the evidence, especially where the findings of fact rest in large measure on considerations relating to the credibility of witnesses (see Thoreson v Penthouse Intl., 80 N.Y.2d 490, 495 [1992]; Loughran v Town of Eastchester,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases