1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 394 F.Supp.2d
  5. 394 F.Supp.2d 299 (2005)
 

WOLVERINE PROCTOR & SCHWARTZ v. AEROGLIDE CORP.

No. CIV.A. 03-11372-NG.

394 F.Supp.2d 299 (2005)

WOLVERINE PROCTOR & SCHWARTZ, INC. and Stanley Serosky, Plaintiffs, v. AEROGLIDE CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

September 19, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Claire S. Bishop, Thomas I. Elkind, Andrew K. Goldstein, Foley & Lardner, Boston, MA, for Wolverine Proctor & Schwartz, Inc., Plaintiff.

Terence D. Friedman, John T. Williamson, Maupin Taylor PA, Raleigh, NC, James E. Gates, Maupin Taylor PA, Raleigh, NC, Sarah B. Herlihy, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo, PC, Boston, Michael C. Lord, Maupin Taylor PA, Raleigh, NC, for Aeroglide Corporation, Defendant.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR TO TRANSFER VENUE

DEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this action, the plaintiffs, Wolverine Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. ("Wolverine") and one of its employees, Stanley Serosky, allege that the defendant, Aeroglide Corporation ("Aeroglide") breached its contractual obligations and misappropriated Wolverine's confidential information...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases