Ronald M. NASTAL and Irene Nastal, His Wife, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
HENDERSON & ASSOCIATES INVESTIGATIONS, INC., A Michigan Corporation, Nathaniel Stovall and Andrew Conley, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued October 5, 2004.
Decided January 25, 2005.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Barbara H. Goldman and Sheldon L. Miller, Southfield, MI, for the plaintiffs.
Kaufman, Payton & Chapa (by Donald L. Payton and Frank A. Misuraca), Farmington Hills, MI, for the defendants.
Martin L. Critchell, Detroit, MI, for Michigan Self-Insurers Association.
Willingham & Cote, P.C. (by Curtis R. Hadley and Matthew K. Payok), East Lansing, MI, for Michigan Council of Private Investigators, Michigan Professional Bail Agents Association, and Court Officers and Deputy Sheriffs, Process Servers of Michigan.
Michelle L. Pinter, Flint, MI, for McMurray, Baio and Associates.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Opinion
TAYLOR, C.J.
In this case, where plaintiff Ronald M. Nastal1 alleges stalking by private investigators conducting surveillance, we granted leave to consider if, and when, such surveillance falls within the safe harbor in the stalking statute that exempts "conduct that serves a legitimate purpose." MCL 750.411h(1)(c). The circuit court concluded that surveillance could serve a legitimate purpose but that, here, there was...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
