1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 14 A.D.3d
  5. 14 A.D.3d 669 (2005)
 

LEE v. GLICKSMAN

14 A.D.3d 669 (2005)

789 N.Y.S.2d 276

MI JA LEE, Respondent, v. PAUL K. GLICKSMAN et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

January 31, 2005.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that a motion for leave to renew and reargue is addressed to the sound discretion of the Supreme Court (see Daniel Perla Assoc. v Ginsberg, 256 A.D.2d 303 [1998]; Loland v City of New York, 212 A.D.2d 674 [1995]). The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion for leave to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases