OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.
By judgment and order of the Supreme Court of Arizona dated January 10, 2005, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law in that state for a period of one year, based upon a finding, inter alia, that he charged a fee for work not performed, and failed to abide by the client's decision concerning the scope and objectives of his representation of the client.
...Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.