The appellant interprets the applicable rate schedules as requiring the submission of an application for the standard wastewater allowance for the period May 13, 1996, through June 30, 1998. We agree with the Supreme Court that the appellant's interpretation was irrational and unreasonable (see Matter of Johnson v Joy,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IN THE MATTER OF ROCHDALE VILLAGE, INC. v. NEW YORK CITY WATER BOARD
18 A.D.3d 664 (2005)
795 N.Y.S.2d 671
In the Matter of ROCHDALE VILLAGE, INC., Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY WATER BOARD, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 16, 2005.
May 16, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.