1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 398 F.3d
  5. 398 F.3d 279 (2005)
 

BRISBIN v. SUPERIOR VALVE CO.

Nos. 03-1793, 03-1851.

398 F.3d 279 (2005)

Kirk BRISBIN, d/b/a Specialty Manufacturing v. SUPERIOR VALVE COMPANY; Sherwood; Harsco Corporation; Taylor-Wharton Gas Equipment Division Harsco Corporation, Sherwood; Taylor-Wharton Gas Equipment Division, Appellants Kirk Brisbin, d/b/a Specialty Manufacturing, Appellant v. Superior Valve Company; Sherwood; Harsco Corporation; Taylor-Wharton Gas Equipment Division.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided February 14, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Melissa H. Maxman, Duane Morris, Philadelphia, PA, Samuel Goldblatt, Nixon Peabody LLP, Buffalo, NY, David H. Tennant (Argued), Nixon Peabody LLP, Rochester, NY, for Appellants/Cross-Appellee.

George E. McGrann (Argued), Sarah E. Diedrich, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Pittsburgh, PA, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Before: ROTH, AMBRO, and CHERTOFF, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

This dispute arises out of a long-term supply relationship gone bad. The plaintiff is Kirk Brisbin, an individual doing business as Specialty Manufacturing ("Specialty").1 Superior Valve Company ("Superior"), one of the named defendants, was acquired by defendant Harsco Corporation in the fall of 1998. After a bench trial, judgment ultimately...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases