HONIG v. SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPT.

No. A106305.

25 Cal.Rptr.3d 649 (2005)

127 Cal.App.4th 520

Lisa HONIG, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT et al., Defendants and Respondents; David Robins et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

March 10, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wiegel & Fried, Clifford E. Fried, San Francisco, and John P. Baba for Plaintiff and Appellant Lisa Honig.

Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney, Judith A. Boyajian and Sarah E. Owsowitz, Deputy City Attorneys for Defendants and Respondents San Francisco Planning Department and Board of Appeals of the City and County of San Francisco.

Reuben & Junius, Joel Yodowitz, San Francisco, and Tuija I. Catalano for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents David Robins and Marge Chambers.


SIMONS, J.

After the neighbors of Lisa Honig (appellant) obtained a variance and building permit authorizing an expansion of the size of their home, appellant unsuccessfully appealed those decisions to the board of appeals.1 Appellant then petitioned for a writ of administrative mandate against defendants and respondents, the planning department and the board of appeals (defendants), and real parties in interest and respondents, David...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases