1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 19 A.D.3d
  5. 19 A.D.3d 651 (2005)
 

KORAMBLYUM v. MEDVEDOVSKY

19 A.D.3d 651 (2005)

799 N.Y.S.2d 73

VICTORIA KORAMBLYUM et al., Respondents, v. MARK MEDVEDOVSKY et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 27, 2005.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The material sought to be excluded by a protective order was not privileged under CPLR 3101 (d) (2) (see Bombard v Amica Mut. Ins. Co., 11 A.D.3d 647, 648 [2004]; Agovino v Taco Bell 5083, 225 A.D.2d 569, 571 [1996]). Moreover, assuming that such a privilege existed, it was waived by the defendants' lack of due diligence (see AFA...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases