1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 24 A.D.3d
  5. 24 A.D.3d 641 (2005)
 

OBERMUELLER v. OBERMUELLER

24 A.D.3d 641 (2005)

808 N.Y.S.2d 324

BAERBEL G. OBERMUELLER, Respondent, v. REINHARD W. OBERMUELLER, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 19, 2005.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently granted the plaintiff's motion, in effect, for a protective order. Although broad financial disclosure is necessary and required in a matrimonial action, the trial court is also vested with "broad discretion to supervise disclosure to prevent unreasonable annoyance, expense, embarrassment, disadvantage or other prejudice" (Geller v. Geller, 240 A.D.2d 539

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases