Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The determination of the Supreme Court was proper, given the brevity of the delay, the absence of willfulness, the defendant's submissions suggesting a meritorious defense, and the public policy in favor of resolving cases on the merits (see Eckna v Kesselman,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.