1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 392 F.Supp.2d
  5. 392 F.Supp.2d 254 (2005)
 

MENDOZA-MOLOSTVOV v. VIGILANT INS. CO.

No. Civ. 303CV1765JCH.

392 F.Supp.2d 254 (2005)

Yola MENDOZA-MOLOSTVOV, Plaintiff, v. VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

February 14, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy S. Ward, Westport, CT, for Plaintiff.

Howard L. Pierce, Jose M. Rojas, Shipman & Goodwin, Hartford, CT, for Defendant.

RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT. NO. 24]

HALL, District Judge.

Defendant Vigilant Insurance Company ("Vigilant") brings this motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Vigilant claims that Yola Mendoza-Molostvov's claims are barred by a contractual provision in her insurance agreement requiring Mendoza-Molostvov to bring all legal action within...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases