1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 371 F.Supp.2d
  5. 371 F.Supp.2d 265 (2005)
 

SHAW v. U.S.

No. 03-CV-3016(ADS)(ARL).

371 F.Supp.2d 265 (2005)

Edward SHAW, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

May 31, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Shaw, Brooklyn, NY, Petitioner Pro Se.

United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division by Debra Brookes, Attorney, John W. McReynolds, Attorney, New York City, Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney, Eastern District of New York by AUSA Tanya Y. Hill, Central Islip, NY, for Respondent.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

This case involves charges that the petitioner Edward Shaw ("Shaw" or the "Petitioner") took part in a bid-rigging conspiracy in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (the "Sherman Act"). On April 30, 2002, pursuant to a Cooperation Agreement (the "Agreement"), the Petitioner pleaded guilty to a one-count information charging him with conspiring to rig bids in violation of the Sherman...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases