1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 30 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 30 Cal.Rptr.3d 606 (2005)
 

SCOTTSDALE INS. v. STATE FARM MUT. INS.

No. B170163.

30 Cal.Rptr.3d 606 (2005)

130 Cal.App.4th 890

SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent; Commercial Underwriters Insurance Company, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing July 26, 2005.

Review Denied October 12, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Selman & Breitman, Alan B. Yuter and Rachel E. Hobbs, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant.

Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, Peter J. Senuty, Mara L. Weber and Barry R. Gammell, Glendale, for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.

Lewis, Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, Michael R. Velladao, Los Angeles, and Jeffry A. Miller for Defendant and Respondent.

SPENCER, P.J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff and Cross-defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company (Scottsdale) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant and cross-complainant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) and defendant Commercial Underwriters Insurance Company (CUIC) after the trial court granted their motions for summary judgment. We conclude the trial court erred in granting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases