1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 393 F.3d
  5. 393 F.3d 226 (2005)
 

HUTCHINSON v. C.I.A.

No. 03-5303.

393 F.3d 226 (2005)

Martha HUTCHINSON, Appellant v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and Porter J. Goss, Director, Central Intelligence Agency, Appellees

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided January 4, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy W. Krieger argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Charles W. Scarborough, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for appellees. On the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Kenneth L. Wainstein, U.S. Attorney, and Mark B. Stern and Catherine Y. Hancock, Attorneys.

Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and TATEL and ROBERTS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.

TATEL, Circuit Judge.

The Central Intelligence Agency fired appellant Martha Hutchinson following three years of poor performance ratings. Convinced she didn't get a fair shake, Hutchinson seeks relief on two grounds: under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(1)(C), based on an alleged omission from her file during an internal appeal; and under the Fifth Amendment for alleged due process violations....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases