1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 17 A.D.3d
  5. 17 A.D.3d 601 (2005)
 

IN THE MATTER OF REYNAR v. VILLAGE OF SLOATSBURG

17 A.D.3d 601 (2005)

792 N.Y.S.2d 870

In the Matter of PATRICK K. REYNAR, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF SLOATSBURG et al., Appellants, and SPECIAL FUNDS CONSERVATION COMMITTEE, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 15, 2005.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the petitioner-respondent.

The decision whether to grant an application for approval of a settlement nunc pro tunc pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 29 (5) is directed to the discretion of the Supreme Court (see Singh v Ross, 12 A.D.3d 498 [2004]; Zamfino v Furman, 1 A.D.3d 591

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases