1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 34 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 34 Cal.Rptr.3d 575 (2005)
 

BURDUSIS v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. B183034.

34 Cal.Rptr.3d 575 (2005)

133 Cal.App.4th 88

Jeremy BURDUSIS, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; Rent-A-Center, Inc., Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

September 13, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bailey, Pinney, Georggin & Krutcik and A. Nicholas Georggin, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Latham & Watkins, Joel E. Krischer, Heather L. Mayer, Keith J. Wesley, Los Angeles, and Joseph B. Farrell, Costa Mesa, for Real Party in Interest.

WOODS, J.

SUMMARY

In this writ proceeding, we consider whether Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6, subdivision (a)(2) permits the exercise of a peremptory challenge on remand following reversal of an order denying class certification where remand is for the sole purpose of allowing the trial court to consider the record in light of two new decisions filed after the appeal.1 We find that no such challenge is permitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases