Ordered that the order is affirmed.
The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying, without a hearing, the defendant's motion to vacate a judgment of conviction. Not only did the defendant fail to make a showing of due diligence with respect to his claim of newly discovered evidence, but the evidence was not such that it would probably change the result in the event a new trial was granted (see People v Salemi,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.