Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The appellant contends that the directive that he pay 50% of the monthly mortgage expense of the marital residence, which is jointly owned by the parties, is in violation of the parties' prenuptial agreement which waived spousal support. On the contrary, the mortgage constitutes a joint obligation of the parties acquired during the marriage (see Rubin v Rubin,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.