Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs established, by clear and convincing evidence, that their use of the driveway in question was adverse, open, notorious, continuous, and uninterrupted for the prescriptive period of 10 years (see CPLR 212 [a]; RPAPL 311; Misak v Rotondi,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.