Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the appellant's contentions, the order dated February 14, 2001, did not hold her in contempt of court or in violation of any Disciplinary Rules. Moreover, there was no basis to grant the further relief sought by the appellant merely because that order, and two other orders, contained language critical of her conduct in the prosecution of this case (see Anspach v Miller Bluff's Constr...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.