1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 382 F.Supp.2d
  5. 382 F.Supp.2d 160 (2005)
 

U.S. v. PELLETIER

No. CR-03-86-B-W.

382 F.Supp.2d 160 (2005)

UNITED STATES of America v. Gordon PELLETIER, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Maine.

July 26, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan R. Chapman, Office of the U.S. Attorney, District of Maine, Portland, ME, for USA, Plaintiff.

Terence M. Harrigan, Vafiades, Brountas & Kominsky, Bangor, ME, for Gordon Pelletier (1), Defendant.

ORDER

WOODCOCK, District Judge.

In the circumstances of this case, a motion to amend judgment is not an appropriate vehicle to alter a restitution obligation in a final criminal judgment; however, with the consent of the Government and the acquiescence of the victim, a motion to modify condition of release is an appropriate vehicle to reach the commonly desired end.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases