MURRAY v. STATE

No. ED 84219.

157 S.W.3d 385 (2005)

Rae Ann MURRAY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

March 8, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig A. Johnston, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Lacey R. Searfoss, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rae Ann Murray appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. She asserts her guilty plea lacked a factual basis. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases