Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the demands for a jury trial are reinstated.
It is undisputed that the two actions involved in this matter are both actions at law seeking money judgments only. Thus, the appellant is entitled to a jury trial in both actions and the Supreme Court should not have stricken her demands therefor (see Mercy Community Hosp. v Cannon Design,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.