GOLDBERGER v. GOLDBERGER


18 A.D.3d 499 (2005)

795 N.Y.S.2d 277

DON GOLDBERGER, Respondent, v. HARRY GOLDBERGER et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 9, 2005.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court erred in determining that a compliance conference order dated December 2, 2003, did not constitute a valid 90-day demand under CPLR 3216. The compliance conference order, signed by both parties, directed the plaintiff, inter alia, to serve and file a note of issue by March 6, 2004, and warned that the failure to comply would result in a dismissal (see Betty v City of New York,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases