1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 118 P.3d
  5. 118 P.3d 398 (2005)
 

LOPEZ v. REYNOSO

No. 22631-0-III.

118 P.3d 398 (2005)

Stephany F. LOPEZ, Appellant, v. Ramon REYNOSO and Jane Doe Reynoso, d/b/a Triple R Auto Sales, a sole proprietorship; and Colonial American Casualty and Surety Company, a foreign corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Three.

August 23, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Trujillo, Law Offices of David B. Trujillo, Yakima, WA, for Appellant.

Alexander A. Friedrich, Yusen & Friedrich, Seattle, WA, Howard N. Schwartz, Attorney at Law, Yakima, WA, for Respondents.

SCHULTHEIS, J.

¶ 1 Parol evidence is generally admissible to construe a written contract and to determine the intent of the parties. Berg v. Hudesman, 115 Wn.2d 657, 669, 801 P.2d 222 (1990). However, parol evidence cannot add to, modify, or contradict the terms of a fully integrated contract. Id. at 670, 801 P.2d 222.

¶ 2 Stephany...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases