KOLIVAS v. KIRCHOFF


14 A.D.3d 493 (2005)

787 N.Y.S.2d 392

LEMONIA KOLIVAS, Respondent, v. MAUREEN D. KIRCHOFF et al., Appellants, and EMMANUEL GIAKOUMIS, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

January 10, 2005.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Summary judgment is a drastic remedy that deprives a litigant of his or her day in court, and it "should only be employed when there is no doubt as to the absence of triable issues" (Andre v Pomeroy, 35 N.Y.2d 361, 364 [1974]). The function of the court on a motion for summary judgment is not to resolve issues of fact or determine matters of credibility, but merely...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases