The defendants established their entitlement to summary judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that there was no employment relationship between the driver involved in the plaintiff's accident and the defendant dispatcher (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PINTO v. TWR EXPRESS CORP.
22 A.D.3d 481 (2005)
803 N.Y.S.2d 640
ANNE PINTO, Appellant, v. TWR EXPRESS CORP. et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 3, 2005.
October 3, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.