1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 37 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 37 Cal.Rptr.3d 460 (2005)
 

ARMENTA v. OSMOSE, INC.

Nos. B174806, B177501.

37 Cal.Rptr.3d 460 (2005)

135 Cal.App.4th 314

Frank Armenta et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. OSMOSE, INC., Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

December 29, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP, Christina J. Imre, Leonora M. Schloss, Douglas J. Collodel, Karen F. White, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant.

Carol D. Janssen; James H. Cordes, Santa Barbara, for Plaintiffs and Respondents Frank Armenta, Colleen Ulrich, Olivia Smith, Brett Kimball, Jon Norvell, Harold Showers, Ronald Showers, Eric Johnston, and Ken Ulrich.

COFFEE, J.

Here we decide the proper method for determining whether California's minimum wage law has been violated under Labor Code section 1194 and how to calculate the waiting time penalties under section 203.1

Appellant Osmose, Inc. appeals from the judgment awarding its former employees, respondents, a total of $90,398.22 in unpaid minimum wages, liquidated damages under section...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases