1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 16 A.D.3d
  5. 16 A.D.3d 481 (2005)
 

ROTHCHILD v. LF AUTO CORP.

16 A.D.3d 481 (2005)

791 N.Y.S.2d 183

STEVEN ROTHCHILD, Respondent, v LF AUTO CORP. et al., Defendants, and HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT, Also Known as HERTZ CORPORATION, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 14, 2005.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the judgment dated October 20, 2003, is reinstated.

The plaintiff did not demonstrate any ground for renewal or reargument of the order dated October 3, 2003 (see CPLR 2221 [d] [2], [e] [2]; [3]). Moreover, the plaintiff did not establish entitlement to vacatur of the judgment dated October 20, 2003 (see...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases