1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 118 P.3d
  5. 118 P.3d 373 (2005)
 

SETO v. AMERICAN ELEVATOR, INC.

No. 54705-4-I.

118 P.3d 373 (2005)

Matthew SETO, a single person, Appellant, v. AMERICAN ELEVATOR, INC., a Washington corporation, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

August 22, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tucker F. Blair, Blair & Meeker LLP, Scott A. Sayre, Brown Sayre PLLP, Seattle, for Appellant.

Erik B. Anderson, Jerrett E. Sale, Deborah L. Carstens, Bullivant Houser Bailey PC, Seattle, for Respondent.

SCHINDLER, J.

¶ 1 The trial court denied Matthew Seto's request for a trial de novo as untimely under the Mandatory Rules of Arbitration (MAR). The question presented is whether service must be complete before the 20-day time period to request a trial de novo begins. The plain language of MAR 7.1 says that the 20-day period to file a request for trial de novo begins on the day the award is filed with the clerk. We conclude the arbitrator's MAR 6.2 obligation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases