1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 118 P.3d
  5. 118 P.3d 368 (2005)
 

STATE v. N.M.K.

No. 54767-4-I.

118 P.3d 368 (2005)

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. N.M.K. [DOB: 08/28/88], Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

August 22, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dana M. Lind, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Carla B. Carlstrom, Catherine M. McDowall, King Co. Prosecutor's Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

COX, C.J.

¶ 1 Where the admissibility of testimonial evidence is at issue, the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution demands that the witness be unavailable at trial and that the accused had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the witness.1 While the full scope of what is included within "testimonial" evidence is not fully defined by the United States Supreme Court, that court made clear that business records are generally...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases